Details
Now the continuity of operations has become a separate performance indicator. The business invests in backup locations and carriers, distributed stocks, duplication of documents and data, autonomous power supply and personnel interchangeability. However, even the best continuity plan will not work if the regulatory procedure tiesthe cargo to the destroyed delivery location or requires the transport to stay in a high-risk area for a long time.
The problem is not in customs control, but in the fact that the logic of peacetime procedures does not always take into account military reality. Themandatorypresentation of goods, the accumulation of trucks near the terminals, the consistent execution of formalities and the complex change of the customs office of destination can increase the time that the cargo spends in a dangerous place. The customs procedure should allow you to flexibly determine the place and form of control, and, if necessary, quickly change the route or place of delivery.
What's next
In 2026, the port infrastructure and the railway are under numerous attacks. Shelling destroys warehouses, terminals, tracks and rolling stock, while supply chains must work even after destruction, blocking of routes or loss of documents.
The benchmark for reforming customs procedures in times of war is simple: the truck should not stand at the place of delivery longer than is objectively necessary for control. As many formalities as possible should be carried out in advance or immediately after the adoption of the declaration. If inspection, sampling or other control measures are not required, completion of delivery should not block further clearance.
